Councilwoman pushed aside on Melville campground issue
To the Editor:
I feel that I must write concerning a
disturbing trend I have noticed at a Portsmouth Town Council meeting, which was
referenced in an article in your paper prior to the holidays. The article
concerned a "shouting match" that occurred over an appointment to the
newly formed Melville Campground Committee
First, let me say that I am very familiar with the operation of
town governments, past and present. I have attended innumerable council
meetings over the past two decades (my husband was on the Town Council in the
mid‑1980s), and have attended virtually every regular meeting of the
present council. I served as town sergeant for four years. It has been a
longstanding practice of common courtesy and mutual respect that when a council
member brings an issue or idea to the council's attention, that member is
allowed to follow through on, his of her initiative. That respect and courtesy
is no longer shown to some councilors.
When a resident wanted to lease the Melville property for a
private development, Councilwoman Amy Rice was immediately opposed and made no
secret of her opposition. She worked with the Open Space Committee and others
to defeat the referendum. Councilman Huck Little, on the other hand, expressed
no opinion on the question. The public vote proved that the overwhelming
majority of residents agreed with Rice and wanted to preserve Melville as a
natural recreation area.
At the Sept. 10 meeting, Ms. Rice again took the initiative and
moved to reactivate the Melville Campground Committee. She was immediately cut
off by Mr. Little, who moved to "workshop" the proposal in order to
come up with a charter for the committee. As a result of that action, Ms. Rice
collaborated with the town administrator to formulate a charter for the
committee and it was presented to the council at an October meeting. Mr.
Little, who had requested the meeting, presented nothing.
Once the charter was accepted and members appointed, the council
voted to appoint Mr. Little as the council representative to the committee.
That appointment was a slap in the face to Ms. Rice. To ignore her obvious
interest, dedication and hard work in favor of a council member who failed to
even take a position on the very future of the Melville Recreation Area was an
insult.
Nevertheless, Ms. Rice graciously suggested that she would be
willing to serve as co‑representative to the committee with Mr. Little.
The council rejected that idea on the basis that joint representatives were
inappropriate. (Interestingly, at the very next meeting, the council appointed
Councilman Jamie R. Heaney and Mr. Little as co‑liaisons to another town
committee).
When confronted with this obvious power play, Mr. Little made it
worse by stating that Ms. Rice didn't deserve the appointment because she has a
hard time attending meetings. The truth is just the opposite. Ms. Rice has
requested that the council refrain from meetings on certain nights because she
has a conflict. The council has regularly refused to accommodate her request.
However, the council has rescheduled meetings, or refrained from holding
meetings, when other (male) members on the council are unavailable or have
important engagements like golf tournaments and cocktail parties. Contrary to
Mr. Little's statement and despite getting little cooperation from her
colleagues, Ms. Rice has rearranged her private schedule to attend the vast
majority of the special meetings and has missed only four regularly scheduled
council meetings, despite having to be out of state for a considerable period
due to the illness and death of her mother.
One may wonder if Ms. Rice is subjected to this treatment
because she is the lone Democrat or because she is a woman; however, the disrespectful
treatment also shown on occasion to the only other female council member
indicates that party politics is not the sole reason. Neither one is a good
reason.
As candidates, all the council members pledged to put party
differences aside once elected. If they can't do that, they've broken their
promise. They also should take a good, hard look at their behavior and put
aside whatever insecurities prevent them from sharing power and dealing openly
and honestly with a strong willed, intelligent woman. After all, Portsmouth has
a large number of women voters who won't forget.
Portsmouth